<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Nicotine &amp; Tobacco Research - Advance Access</title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Nicotine &amp; Tobacco Research - RSS feed of articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1469-994X</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Nicotine &amp; Tobacco Research</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1462-2203</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp170v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp166v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp159v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp157v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp162v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp165v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp164v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp160v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp154v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp158v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp155v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp149v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp148v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp153v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp152v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp170v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lung function testing influences the attitude toward smoking cessation]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp170v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>Smoking cessation is the single most effective way to prevent or delay the development of airflow limitation or to reduce its progression in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of the study was to explore whether performing a spirometry changes attitudes toward smoking cessation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method:</st>
<p>A random sample of 513 smokers, of whom 77 had COPD, answered a questionnaire before, shortly after (less than 4 weeks), and 3 months after performing a lung function test.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Prior to spirometry, 57% of the smokers with COPD and 52% of those with normal spirometry claimed that they were not planning to quit smoking within the next 6 months. After the spirometry, 9% (<I>p</I> &lt; .0001) of those with COPD and 38% (<I>p</I> = .009) of those with normal spirometry had no intention to stop smoking. Three months later, corresponding figures were 28% in COPD and 48% in smokers with normal spirometry, and the point prevalence of quitters was 30% for the COPD group and 14% for the normal group (<I>p</I> = .02).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>We conclude that performing spirometry changes the attitude toward smoking for a short time. We hypothesize that smokers may be more susceptible to smoking cessation activities during this period.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sundblad, B.-M., Larsson, K., Nathell, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:14:37 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp170</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lung function testing influences the attitude toward smoking cessation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp166v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Test marketing of new smokeless tobacco products in four U.S. cities]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp166v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>This exploratory study was designed to assess the availability, price, and point-of-purchase marketing strategies for new smokeless tobacco products in 4 test market areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>A random sample of 50 gas stations, convenience and food stores, and tobacco shops was selected in each of 4 test market areas. Pairs of observers visited each store, recorded product information, and engaged vendors in conversation about product demand.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Snus was available in 64% of the stores, but availability and price differed by brand. Point-of-purchase marketing also varied by brand on a variety of dimensions and all brands appeared to be marketed primarily to smokers. Camel Snus was described by store attendants as having the highest demand and was also the most expensive of the observed products. In light of the number of test market cities and intensity of promotion at retail locations, Camel Snus was the most intensively marketed product.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>The results appear to reflect differences in marketing strategy by American snus manufacturers. These strategies may help to predict future marketing of snus and other tobacco products and may provide a baseline for later assessments of product acceptance.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rogers, J. D., Biener, L., Clark, P. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:17:26 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp166</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Test marketing of new smokeless tobacco products in four U.S. cities]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp159v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The effect of a culturally tailored smoking cessation for Chinese American smokers]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp159v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>Tobacco use is a serious public health problem among low-income Chinese Americans with limited English proficiency. Chinese men are at high risk for smoking-related morbidity and mortality. We tested the feasibility of a culturally and linguistically sensitive smoking intervention program with combined counseling and pharmacological components for Chinese smokers in New York City; identified factors and techniques that enhance the administration and appropriateness of the intervention program; and examined the overall impact of this program on quit attempts, quit rates, and overall smoking reduction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>We were guided by the transtheoretical model and used an adapted motivational interviewing (MI) approach. The study involved a randomized sample with pretreatment assessment and multiple follow-up measures. Eligible participants (<I>N</I> = 122) were randomly assigned to intervention (4 individualized counselor-led MI sessions and nicotine replacement therapy [NRT]) or control groups (4 general health education sessions, self-help materials, and NRT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Quit rate at 6 months in the intervention group was 67% versus 32% for the control group, indicating minimal relapse and a highly successful intervention program. Increase in self-efficacy and decease in pros of smoking from baseline to 6-month follow-up were positively associated with smoking cessation. The number of cigarette smoked at baseline was inversely related to smoking cessation. Results indicate that a combined intensive behavioral counseling and pharmacological intervention can reduce smoking substantially.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion:</st>
<p>The results of this pilot will be used as a basis for a large-scale randomized trial of an intervention with combined culturally and linguistically sensitive MI and NRT components for Chinese and other Asian ethnic groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wu, D., Ma, G. X., Zhou, K., Zhou, D., Liu, A., Poon, A. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:27:44 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp159</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The effect of a culturally tailored smoking cessation for Chinese American smokers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp157v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Characteristics of current and recent former smokers associated with the use of new potential reduced-exposure tobacco products]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp157v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives:</st>
<p>To identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with having tried a potentialy reduced-exposure tobacco product (PREP) and to compare the smoking and quitting behaviors and attitudes of smokers who have tried a PREP product with non-PREP users.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Analysis is based on a sample of 43,419 current and recent former smokers from the 2003 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Overall, PREP use is low (2.5%). Current daily and someday only smokers have higher rates of use (2.9% and 2.4%, respectively) compared with former smokers (1.5%). PREP use is higher in southern states and among younger smokers, non-Hispanic Whites, and those with some college education. Smokers who have tried a PREP product are more likely to smoke light or ultra-light cigarettes, report more symptoms of nicotine dependence, smoke more cigarettes per day, report a higher number of quit attempts, and seek quitting assistance from pharmacotherapy and behavioral therapies compared with non-PREP users.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>These findings support the concern that current smokers who are highly dependent yet motivated to quit smoking may seek PREPs as an alternative strategy to smoking cessation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parascandola, M., Augustson, E., Rose, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:27:43 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp157</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Characteristics of current and recent former smokers associated with the use of new potential reduced-exposure tobacco products]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp162v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sibutramine for weight gain attenuation during smoking cessation with varenicline: A pilot study]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp162v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>Weight gain following tobacco abstinence is a significant barrier to cessation. Varenicline is the most effective medication for smoking cessation but does not prevent weight gain. Combining sibutramine and varenicline may facilitate smoking abstinence if weight gain is attenuated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Our aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of sibutramine for weight gain prevention among women quitting smoking with varenicline. Ten smokers enrolled in a pilot study of open-label sibutramine and varenicline for 12 weeks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Participants rated themselves low on appearance evaluation, health evaluation, health orientation, and body-areas satisfaction. Ninety percent reported that they would return to smoking if they gained weight after stopping smoking. For the 6 subjects who met criteria for prolonged abstinence, weight change from baseline to Week 12 (11 weeks after the target quit date) was 0.2 &plusmn; 1.3 kg, and the 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rate at Week 12 was 70% (95% <I>CI</I> 35%&ndash;93%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>Combination therapy with sibutramine and varenicline for weight gain prevention and smoking cessation as an intervention for smokers at risk for relapse to smoking because of weight gain may warrant further investigation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sood, A., Ebbert, J. O., Clark, M. M., Croghan, I. T., Schroeder, D. R., Hays, J. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:13:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp162</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sibutramine for weight gain attenuation during smoking cessation with varenicline: A pilot study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp165v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Smoking cessation for hospitalized smokers: An evaluation of the "Ottawa Model"]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp165v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>Interventions for hospitalized smokers can increase long-term smoking cessation rates. The Ottawa Model for Smoking Cessation (the "Ottawa Model") is an application of the "5 A&rsquo;s" approach to cessation, customized to the hospital setting. This study evaluated the impact of implementing the Ottawa Model in 9 hospitals in eastern Ontario.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>The RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework was used to evaluate the intervention. Trained outreach facilitators assisted 9 hospitals to implement the Ottawa Model; program delivery was then monitored over a 1-year period using administrative data and data from a follow-up database. A before-and-after study was conducted to gauge the effect of the Ottawa Model program on cessation rates 6 months after hospitalization. Self-reports of smoking cessation were biochemically confirmed in a random sample of patients, and all cessation rates were corrected for potential misreporting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Sixty-nine percent of the expected number of smokers received the Ottawa Model intervention. Controlling for hospital, the confirmed 6-month continuous abstinence rate was higher after, than before, introduction of the Ottawa Model (29.4% vs. 18.3%; odds ratio = 1.71, 95% <I>CI</I> = 1.11&ndash;2.64; <I>Z</I> = 2.43; <I>I</I><sup>2</sup> = 0%; <I>p</I> = .02). The intervention was more likely to accomplish counseling for smokers than delivery of medications or postdischarge follow-up. Attitudinal, managerial, and environmental challenges to program implementation were identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>Trained outreach facilitators successfully implemented the Ottawa Model in 9 hospitals leading to significantly higher long-term cessation rates. The public health implications of systematic cessation programs for hospitalized smokers are profound.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reid, R. D., Mullen, K.-A., Slovinec D'Angelo, M. E., Aitken, D. A., Papadakis, S., Haley, P. M., McLaughlin, C. A., Pipe, A. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:47:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp165</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Smoking cessation for hospitalized smokers: An evaluation of the "Ottawa Model"]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp164v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The role of nicotine replacement therapy in early quitting success]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp164v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is an effective but underutilized smoking cessation aid despite being available over the counter. This exploratory study examined whether voluntary early use of NRT predicted cessation in a self-initiated quit attempt better than other commonly studied variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Data were collected from 99 adult smokers desiring to quit smoking in the near future over a 10-day baseline period prior to the implementation of a contingency management intervention. NRT use was neither encouraged nor discouraged during the study. Initial abstinence, biochemically verified using a criterion of CO level &lt;4 ppm, was conceptualized in 2 ways: (a) any day of baseline abstinence and (b) the sum of baseline days abstinent. We examined the predictive value of NRT use as well as demographics, self-efficacy, motivational readiness, and nicotine dependence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>While greater self-efficacy was predictive of initial abstinence, NRT use was the most consistent predictor. The odds of abstaining at least 1 day during baseline were 16.8 times greater for those who used NRT on Day 1 than nonusers. Self-efficacy and "any baseline NRT use" contributed significant amounts of variance to the "sum of days abstinent," with the overall model explaining 29% of the variance (<I>p</I> &lt; .001). The sum of baseline days of NRT use and use of NRT on Day 1 also predicted the "sum of days abstinent."</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>Given NRT's effectiveness, but underutilization in real-world settings, the data support the need for interventions or strategies encouraging people to use NRT in their quit attempts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amodei, N., Lamb, R. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:43:44 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp164</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The role of nicotine replacement therapy in early quitting success]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp160v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Parental monitoring at age 11 and smoking initiation up to age 17 among Blacks and Whites: A prospective investigation]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp160v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>Parental monitoring has been identified as a predictor of adolescent smoking initiation. However, it is uncertain if the association is uniform across different racial groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Random samples of low birth-weight and normal birth-weight children were drawn from newborn discharge lists (1983&ndash;1985) of two major hospitals in southeast Michigan, one serving an inner city and the other serving suburbs. Assessments occurred at ages 6, 11, and 17 years. Statistical analysis was conducted on children with data on parent monitoring at age 11 and tobacco use at age 17 who had never smoked a cigarette up to age 11 (<I>n</I> = 572). Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the association between parent monitoring and children's smoking initiation. Two-way interactions were tested.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>The relationship between parent monitoring at age 11 and child smoking initiation from ages 11 to 17 varied by race. Among White children, an increase of 1 point on the parent monitoring scale signaled an 11% reduction in the odds of initiating smoking by age 17. In contrast, parent monitoring was not significantly associated with smoking initiation among Black children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>The results suggest a differential influence of parent monitoring on adolescent smoking between White and Black children. Future research would benefit from close attention to parental goals and concerns and to extra-familial factors that shape smoking behavior across racially and socially disparate communities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bohnert, K. M., Rios-Bedoya, C. F., Breslau, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:43:43 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp160</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Parental monitoring at age 11 and smoking initiation up to age 17 among Blacks and Whites: A prospective investigation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp154v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A randomized clinical trial of nicotine lozenge for smokeless tobacco use]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp154v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>Smokeless tobacco (ST) use is associated with adverse health consequences, and effective treatments are needed. Pilot data suggest that 4-mg nicotine lozenge decreases tobacco craving and nicotine withdrawal symptoms among ST users.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of 12 weeks of 4-mg nicotine lozenge for ST use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>We randomized 270 participants (136 active lozenge, 134 placebo). No significant differences were observed between the groups in biochemically confirmed all tobacco abstinence rates at Week 12 (36% lozenge vs. 27.6% placebo; odds ratio [<I>OR</I>] 1.5, 95% <I>CI</I> 0.7&ndash;2.1; <I>p</I> = .138). However, the 4-mg nicotine lozenge increased self-reported all tobacco abstinence (44.1% vs. 29.1%; <I>OR</I> 1.9, 95% <I>CI</I> 1.2&ndash;3.2; <I>p</I> = .011) and self-reported ST abstinence (50.7% vs. 34.3%; <I>OR</I> 2.0, 95% <I>CI</I> 1.2&ndash;3.2; <I>p</I> = .013) compared with placebo at the end of treatment (Week 12). Following target quit date (TQD), nicotine withdrawal symptoms decreased significantly with time (time effect = &ndash;.022 per day, <I>SE</I> = .003; <I>p</I> &lt; .001) and was significantly lower for the active lozenge (treatment effect = &ndash;.213, <I>SE</I> = .071; <I>p</I> = .003). Tobacco craving also decreased significantly following TQD (time effect = &ndash;.071, <I>SE</I> = .006; <I>p</I> &lt; .001) and was lower for the active nicotine lozenge (treatment effect = &ndash;.452, <I>SE</I> = .164; <I>p</I> = .006).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>The 4-mg nicotine lozenge increased self-reported but not biochemically confirmed tobacco abstinence rates at 3 months. The use of the 4-mg nicotine lozenge is associated with decreased nicotine withdrawal symptoms and tobacco craving.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ebbert, J. O., Severson, H. H., Croghan, I. T., Danaher, B. G., Schroeder, D. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:36:19 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp154</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A randomized clinical trial of nicotine lozenge for smokeless tobacco use]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp158v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Employment, gender, and smoking cessation outcomes in low-income smokers using nicotine replacement therapy]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp158v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>This study examines the presence and correlates of gender disparities in smoking cessation among lower income smokers prescribed nicotine replacement medication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>We examined quit rates (7-day abstinence point prevalence) among a cohort of smokers who filled prescriptions for nicotine replacement (<I>N</I> = 1,782), using Minnesota Health Care Programs&rsquo; (e.g., Medicaid) pharmacy claims databases (2005&ndash;2006) and mixed-mode survey protocols. A cohort of smokers who recently filled a prescription for nicotine replacement was stratified by race, and then subjects were selected by simple random sample from each race, oversampling the nonWhite groups (<I>N</I> = 1,782). The primary outcome was point prevalence of 7-day abstinence, and outcomes were assessed about 8 months after the nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) index prescription fill date using a mixed-mode survey protocol. Final interaction models were constructed using backward elimination.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Abstinence rates were 11.4% among women and 19.2% among men (<I>p</I> = .02) and remained marginally significant after controlling for demographics, mental and physical health, period of cigarette abstinence, social environment, religious attendance, perceived stress, and NRT prescription type (<I>p</I> = .08). There was a significant Gender <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> Employment interaction (<I>p</I> = .02). Among men, quit rates were higher among the employed (26%) compared with the unemployed (16%); among women, quit rates were lower among those who were employed (8%) compared with those who were unemployed (14%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>Results suggest the need for research on factors specific to women's work roles or workplaces that inhibit cessation as well as cessation programs tailored to low-income, employed female smokers. On-site workplace interventions and flexible counseling programs may be especially beneficial.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burgess, D. J., Fu, S. S., Noorbaloochi, S., Clothier, B. A., Ricards, J., Widome, R., van Ryn, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:53:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp158</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Employment, gender, and smoking cessation outcomes in low-income smokers using nicotine replacement therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp155v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Public health or social impacts? A qualitative analysis of attitudes toward the smoke-free legislation in Scotland]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp155v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>Introduction of smoke-free legislation presents a unique opportunity to study how population-level interventions can challenge existing smoking norms. Our study examined support and opposition to the Scottish legislation and ascertained the relative importance of social and health factors in shaping attitudes among bar customers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Repeat (pre-/post-legislation) recorded and transcribed semistructured interviews with customers (<I>n</I> = 67/62) of eight community bars in contrasting settings were conducted, and data were analyzed thematically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>While the legislation was marketed primarily in terms of gains to public and individual health, supportive and opposing responses to the legislation tended to be framed around libertarian and practical factors. Attitudes tended to be stable across both waves of data collection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>It is concluded that reasons for smoking were not challenged by promotion of the legislation. In addition to a focus on health gains, social marketing of smoke-free legislation and initiatives may therefore benefit from a stronger focus on social and contextual effects of such policies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heim, D., Ross, A., Eadie, D., MacAskill, S., Davies, J. B., Hastings, G., Haw, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:53:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp155</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Public health or social impacts? A qualitative analysis of attitudes toward the smoke-free legislation in Scotland]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp149v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Parent quit attempts after counseling to reduce children's secondhand smoke exposure and promote cessation: Main and moderating relationships]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp149v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>This study explored predictors of smoking quit attempts in a sample of low-income smoking mothers who participated in a randomized trial of a 6-month, 14-session counseling intervention to decrease their children&rsquo;s secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) and eliminate smoking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Measures were taken at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months on 150 mothers who exposed their children (aged &lt;4 years) to &ge;10 cigarettes/week in the home. Reported 7-day quits were verified by saliva cotinine or urine anabasine and anatabine levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>There were few quits longer than 6 months. Mothers in the counseling group reported more 24-hr quits (<I>p</I> = .019) and more 7-day quits (<I>p</I> = .029) than controls. Multivariate modeling revealed that having quit for at least 24 hr in the year prior to baseline and the number of alternative cessation methods ever tried were predictive of the longest quit attempt during the 18-month study. Mothers in the counseling group who at baseline felt SHSe posed a health risk for their children or who at baseline had more permissive home smoking policies had longer quit attempts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>Results confirm that attempts to quit smoking predict additional quit attempts. This suggests that practice may be necessary for many people to quit smoking permanently. Findings of interaction analyses suggest that participant factors may alter the effects of treatment procedures. Failure to account for or employ such factors in the analysis or design of community trials could confound the results of intervention trials.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liles, S., Hovell, M. F., Matt, G. E., Zakarian, J. M., Jones, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:53:42 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp149</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Parent quit attempts after counseling to reduce children's secondhand smoke exposure and promote cessation: Main and moderating relationships]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp148v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Counseling to reduce children's secondhand smoke exposure and help parents quit smoking: A controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp148v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>We tested a combined intervention to reduce children&rsquo;s secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) and help parents quit smoking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>After baseline, mothers who exposed their children younger than 4 years to 10 or more cigarettes/week were randomized to the intervention (<I>n</I> = 76) or usual care control condition (<I>n</I> = 74). Outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Intervention families were offered 10 in-person at home and 4 telephone counseling sessions over 6 months, and additional pre- and postquit telephone sessions. Counseling procedures included behavioral contracting, self-monitoring, and problem solving.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Parents&rsquo; reports of their smoking and children&rsquo;s exposure showed moderate and significant correlations with children&rsquo;s urine cotinine levels and home air nicotine (<I>r</I> = .40&ndash;.78). Thirteen (17.1%) intervention group mothers and 4 (5.4%) controls reported that they quit smoking for 7 days prior to 1 or more study measurements, without biochemical contradiction (<I>p</I> = .024). Results of generalized estimating equations showed significantly greater decrease in reported SHSe and mothers&rsquo; smoking in the counseled group compared with controls. Reported indoor smoking and children&rsquo;s urine cotinine decreased, yet group differences for changes were not significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>Nicotine contamination of the home and resulting thirdhand exposure may have contributed to the failure to obtain a differential decrease in cotinine concentration. Partial exposure to counseling due to dropouts and lack of full participation from all family members and measurement reactivity in both conditions may have constrained intervention effects. Secondhand smoke exposure counseling may have been less powerful when combined with smoking cessation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hovell, M. F., Zakarian, J. M., Matt, G. E., Liles, S., Jones, J. A., Hofstetter, C. R., Larson, S. N., Benowitz, N. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:53:41 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp148</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Counseling to reduce children's secondhand smoke exposure and help parents quit smoking: A controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp153v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chronic pain and cigarette smoking and nicotine dependence among a representative sample of adults]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp153v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>Individuals with chronic pain problems are at an increased risk for certain types of substance abuse and dependence. Recent work suggests that there is a significant association between chronic pain and cigarette smoking; however, it is unclear as to whether pain&ndash;smoking effects are evident above and beyond sociodemographic factors and cooccurring substance use disorders. The present investigation examined the relation between lifetime and current (past year) chronic pain and cigarette smoking status and nicotine dependence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>This investigation comprised a large representative sample of English-speaking adults (<I>n</I> = 9,282) residing in the United States. Data were collected primarily through face-to-face interviews conducted between February 2001 and April 2003.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>After adjusting for sociodemographic variables and the presence of a lifetime substance use disorder, individuals with a lifetime history of chronic neck or back pain were significantly more likely to be current smokers and to be diagnosed with lifetime as well as current nicotine dependence. Although there was no significant incremental relation between current chronic neck and back pain and being a current smoker, there was a significant association with lifetime and current nicotine dependence. Similar relations were evident among those with and without medically unexplained chronic pain in regard to smoking status and lifetime and current nicotine dependence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>Findings are discussed in terms of better understanding the chronic pain&ndash;smoking association.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zvolensky, M. J., McMillan, K., Gonzalez, A., Asmundson, G. J. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:47:59 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp153</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chronic pain and cigarette smoking and nicotine dependence among a representative sample of adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp152v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Smoker interest in lower harm alternatives to cigarettes: National survey data]]></title>
<link>http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ntp152v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction:</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to examine knowledge and attitudes to lower harm alternatives to cigarettes among New Zealand (NZ) smokers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>The NZ arm of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey (ITC Project) utilizes the NZ Health Survey (a national sample). From this sample, we surveyed adult smokers (<I>N</I> = 1,376).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Knowledge about smokeless tobacco was poor, with only 16% regarding such products as less harmful than ordinary cigarettes. Only 7% considered such products to be "a lot less" harmful. When participants were asked to assume that these products were much less harmful than cigarettes, 34% of smokers stated that they would be interested in trying smokeless tobacco products, with another 11% saying "maybe" or "don&rsquo;t know." In the multivariate analysis, Maori smokers were significantly more interested in trying smokeless products than Europeans in all 3 models considered (e.g., Model 1: adjusted odds ratio [<I>AOR</I>] = 1.71, 95% <I>CI</I> = 1.23&ndash;2.37). There was also significantly increased interest for those concerned about the impact of smoking on health and quality of life in the future (<I>AOR</I> = 1.44, 95% <I>CI</I> = 1.17&ndash;1.78). But interest did not vary significantly by 2 measures of socioeconomic status and varied inconsistently by 2 measures of financial stress.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion:</st>
<p>The finding that one third of smokers said that they would be interested in trying smokeless products suggests that these products could have a role as part of a tobacco epidemic endgame that phases out smoked tobacco. Differences in interest level by ethnic group may be relevant to stimulating further work in this area (e.g., among those health workers concerned for smokers with the highest need to quit).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson, N., Borland, R., Weerasekera, D., Edwards, R., Russell, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:47:56 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ntr/ntp152</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Smoker interest in lower harm alternatives to cigarettes: National survey data]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief Report</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>