Skip Navigation

Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2009 11(6):577-583; doi:10.1093/ntr/ntp115
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hébert, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hébert, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

What's new in Nicotine & Tobacco Research?

Richard Hébert

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.


    Outdoor smoking bans: The new frontier?
 
Many countries now restrict smoking in outdoor settings, from restaurant patios to parks and stadiums. Because these may represent the next frontier in smoke-free environments, Thomson et al. (p. 584) reviewed 16 surveys to measure public attitudes toward such policies in developed, English-speaking countries.

  • Support was highest for bans in places frequented by children, as high as 91% in California and British surveys.
  • Support increased over time: by 2006, 80% supported smoke-free sports stadiums in Australia.
  • Even a majority of smokers supported outdoor smoke-free laws in five surveys.
  • How and by whom questions were asked affected answers, however.

One example: A New Zealand survey for the tobacco industry asked if smoking at outdoor sports events should be left "to the common sense of the people concerned." No surprise: 33% said yes; another 38% preferred "no restriction at all." Tipping the scale in the opposite direction was a survey . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Uruguay v. Mexico: Total bans change minds
 

    Irish pubs: Smoking bans slash pollution
 

    Secondhand smoke: Not just from spouses
 

    Smoke-free homes: ‘A powerful tool’
 

    Scotland: Smoke-free pubs’ added benefits
 

    Smoking in cars puts kids at high risk
 

    Smoking at home? No room is ‘safe’
 

    Smokers learn to like smoke-free rules
 

    Hospital care: Only one of five A’s
 

    Bupropion: No help for the hospitalized
 

    Validating pregnant smokers: New tools
 

    Preeclampsia: Nicotine may protect – or not
 

    Drug use hinders quitting smoking
 

    Racial differences in prison intervention
 

    Nicotine may improve timing
 

    After pregnancy: Stress, depression matter
 

    Nicotine pouch: As good as gum
 

    Teens: Reduce craving before quitting
 

    Military snuff and chew: Phone calls help
 

    On campus: Money and empathy fall short
 

    Troubled teens may smoke more for reward
 

    Do hospital smokers prefer hospital help?
 

    Weight gain: Short-term, not from calories
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?