Skip Navigation


Nicotine & Tobacco Research Advance Access originally published online on April 16, 2009
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2009 11(5):481-492; doi:10.1093/ntr/ntp030
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Article Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/5/481    most recent
ntp030v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bolt, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bolt, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, T. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Wisconsin Predicting Patients' Relapse questionnaire

Daniel M. Bolt, Megan E. Piper, Danielle E. McCarthy, Sandra J. Japuntich, Michael C. Fiore, Stevens S. Smith and Timothy B. Baker

Daniel M. Bolt, Ph.D., Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI
Megan E. Piper, Ph.D., Department of Medicine, Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin Medical School and Public Health, Madison, WI
Danielle E. McCarthy, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Sandra J. Japuntich, M.S., Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI
Michael C. Fiore, M.D., M.P.H., Department of Medicine, Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin Medical School and Public Health, Madison, WI
Stevens S. Smith, Ph.D., Department of Medicine, Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin Medical School and Public Health, Madison, WI
Timothy B. Baker, Ph.D., Department of Medicine, Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin Medical School and Public Health, Madison, WI

Corresponding Author: Megan E. Piper, Ph.D., Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 1930 Monroe Street, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711, USA. Telephone: 608-265-5472; Fax: 608-265-3102; E-mail: mep{at}ctri.medicine.wisc.edu


   Abstract

Introduction: Relapse is the most common smoking cessation outcome. Accurate prediction of relapse likelihood could be an important clinical tool used to influence treatment selection or duration. The aim of this research was to develop a brief clinical relapse proneness questionnaire to be used with smokers interested in quitting in a clinical setting where time is at a premium.

Methods: Diverse items assessing constructs shown in previous research to be related to relapse risk, such as nicotine dependence and self-efficacy, were evaluated to determine their independent contributions to relapse prediction. In an exploratory dataset, candidate items were assessed among smokers motivated to quit smoking who enrolled in one of three randomized controlled smoking cessation trials. A cross-validation dataset was used to compare the relative predictive power of the new instrument against the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) at 1-week, 8-week, and 6-month postquit assessments.

Results: We selected seven items with relatively nonoverlapping content for the Wisconsin Predicting Patient's Relapse (WI-PREPARE) measure, a brief, seven-item questionnaire that taps physical dependence, environmental factors, and individual difference characteristics. Cross-validation analyses suggested that the WI-PREPARE demonstrated a stronger prediction of relapse at 1-week and 8-week postquit assessments than the FTND and comparable prediction to the FTND at a 6-month postquit assessment.

Discussion: The WI-PREPARE is easy to score, suggests the nature of a patient's relapse risk, and predicts short- and medium-term relapse better than the FTND.

Received: February 21, 2008; Accepted: September 17, 2008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.