Skip Navigation



Nicotine & Tobacco Research Advance Access published online on June 18, 2009

Nicotine & Tobacco Research, doi:10.1093/ntr/ntp102
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Article Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/8/996    most recent
ntp102v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aitken, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Pellegrini, B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aitken, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Pellegrini, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Smokers of illicit tobacco report significantly worse health than other smokers

Campbell K. Aitken, Tim R. L. Fry, Lisa Farrell and Breanna Pellegrini

Campbell K. Aitken, Ph.D., Centre for Population Health, Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health, Melbourne, Australia
Tim R. L. Fry, Ph.D., School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
Lisa Farrell, Ph.D., School of Economics and Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Breanna Pellegrini, B.Com., School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

Corresponding Author: Campbell K. Aitken, Ph.D., Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health, PO Box 2284, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia. Telephone: +61 3 9282 2114; Fax: +61 3 9282 2138; E-mail: aitken{at}burnet.edu.au


   Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether the health of past and current smokers of illicit tobacco (chop-chop) differs from that of smokers of licit tobacco.

Methods: The design was a telephone survey, stratified by state, using computer aided telephone interviewing, with households selected by random digit dialing from the telephone white pages. Setting was all Australian states and territories, 1,621 regular tobacco smokers aged 18+ years. Measures were social and personal characteristics of tobacco smokers, smoking histories and patterns, and health status (SF-8 and disability weights). Binary logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with current and lifetime chop-chop use.

Results: Compared with licit-only tobacco smokers, current users of chop-chop had significantly greater odds of beginning smoking aged <16 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.65, 95% CI = 1.09–2.50), of reporting below-average social functioning (OR 1.61, 95% CI = 1.06–2.44), and of a measurable disability (OR 1.95, 95% CI = 1.08–3.51). Lifetime chop-chop users were relatively likely to be less than 45 years of age (OR 1.82, 95% CI = 1.38–2.39), report below-average mental health (OR 1.61, 95% CI = 1.22–2.13) and above-average bodily pain (OR 1.40, 95% CI = 1.06–1.85), smoke more than 120 cigarettes/week (OR 1.39, 95% CI = 1.06–1.83), and to have begun smoking aged <16 years (OR 1.33, 95% CI = 1.01–1.75).

Discussion: Current and lifetime users of chop-chop report significantly worse health than smokers of licit tobacco. Investigation of how to communicate this finding to current and potential chop-chop smokers is warranted.

Received: September 29, 2008; Accepted: March 5, 2009
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.