Skip Navigation


Nicotine & Tobacco Research Advance Access originally published online on April 3, 2009
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2009 11(4):342-347; doi:10.1093/ntr/ntp027
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Article Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/4/342    most recent
ntp027v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caldwell, B.
Right arrow Articles by Crane, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caldwell, B.
Right arrow Articles by Crane, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.Permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A pilot study of nicotine delivery to smokers from a metered-dose inhaler

Brent Caldwell, Stuart Dickson, Carl Burgess, Robert Siebers, Sima Mala, Adrienne Parkes and Julian Crane

Brent Caldwell, M.B., Ch.B., Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
Stuart Dickson, Ph.D., Institute of Environmental Science and Research, Porirua, Wellington, New Zealand
Carl Burgess, M.D., Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
Robert Siebers, F.I.Biol., Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
Sima Mala, Ph.D., Institute of Environmental Science and Research, Porirua, Wellington, New Zealand
Adrienne Parkes, M.Sc., Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
Julian Crane, F.R.A.C.P., Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand

Corresponding Author: Julian Crane, F.R.A.C.P., Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, New Zealand. Telephone: +64 4 385 5999; Fax: +64 4 389 5427; E-mail: julian.crane{at}otago.ac.nz


  Abstract

Introduction: The present study generated preliminary data on the acceptability and pharmacokinetics of nicotine administered by a simple metered-dose inhaler (MDI).

Methods: We conducted a nonrandomized, open-label cross-over trial of 10 current smokers. On Day 1, a single cigarette was smoked ad libitum. On Day 2, participants took 10 puffs (20 inhalations) of 50 µg nicotine/puff through the inhaler, and on Day 3, they took 10 puffs (20 inhalations) of 100 µg nicotine/puff, each over 5 min. Nicotine pharmacokinetics, changes in heart rate and blood pressure, and the acceptability of the inhalers were measured and recorded.

Results: Nicotine administered by an MDI produced a median maximum plasma concentration that was about 50% of that obtained by smoking a cigarette (12.5 vs. 25.9 ng/ml) and took twice the time to reach that concentration, 6 versus 3 min. Self-rated satisfaction and reduced urge to smoke were similar for the MDIs and a cigarette.

Discussion: The results suggest that nicotine can be delivered effectively by the pulmonary route using a standard MDI. The inhaler appears to provide a satisfaction level and reduction in the urge to smoke relatively similar to that provided by smoking a cigarette. These conclusions require verification in a larger controlled study.

Received: October 4, 2007; Accepted: November 27, 2008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.