Skip Navigation


Nicotine & Tobacco Research Advance Access originally published online on February 26, 2009
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2009 11(2):164-170; doi:10.1093/ntr/ntp012
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Article Summary
Right arrow Article Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/2/164    most recent
ntp012v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nguyen, Q. B.
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, S.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nguyen, Q. B.
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, S.-H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Intermittent smokers who used to smoke daily: A preliminary study on smoking situations

Quyen B. Nguyen and Shu-Hong Zhu

Quyen B. Nguyen, M.S., M.P.H., San Diego State University/University of California Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA
Shu-Hong Zhu, Ph.D., Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA

Corresponding Author: Shu-Hong Zhu, Ph.D., Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, #0905, La Jolla, CA 92093-0905, USA. Telephone: 858-300-1056. Fax: 858-300-1099. Email: szhu{at}ucsd.edu


  Abstract

Introduction: As many as half of intermittent (i.e., nondaily) smokers once smoked daily. Little is known about their transition from daily to intermittent smoking, a process that eventually leads them to forgo smoking on some days.

Method: The present study attempted to gain insight by analyzing situations in which these individuals were likely to smoke. It used data from a California population tobacco survey with a supplemental questionnaire on smoking situations of young adults (aged 18–29 years, n = 1,581). The analysis in the present study divided smokers into three groups: daily smokers, intermittent smokers who never smoked daily (never-daily intermittent), and intermittent smokers who formerly smoked daily (former-daily intermittent).

Results: Former-daily intermittent smokers were more similar to never-daily intermittent smokers than to daily smokers in seven types of smoking situation, regardless of whether the situations were more social and episodic, such as "at parties," or more routine, such as while "driving." This held true even though these former-daily intermittent smokers were daily smokers only about 22 months on average before the survey. It appears that former-daily intermittent smokers reduce their probability of smoking across all situations.

Discussion: We propose a simple model to explain how a reduction in smoking probability across all situations might lead former-daily intermittent smokers to first forgo smoking on days with no social events. The fact that smokers frequently go from daily to nondaily smoking has both theoretical and practical implications for nicotine research and for public health campaigns to reduce tobacco-related diseases.

Received: December 10, 2007; Accepted: April 4, 2008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.