Skip Navigation


Nicotine & Tobacco Research Advance Access originally published online on March 5, 2009
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2009 11(2):156-163; doi:10.1093/ntr/ntp011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Article Summary
Right arrow Article Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/2/156    most recent
ntp011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rigotti, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rigotti, N. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The natural history of light smokers: A population-based cohort study

Douglas E. Levy, Lois Biener and Nancy A. Rigotti

Douglas E. Levy, Ph.D., Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Institute for Health Policy, and Department of Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital, and Department of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Lois Biener, Ph.D., Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA
Nancy A. Rigotti, M.D., Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Institute for Health Policy, and Department of Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital, and Department of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Corresponding Author: Douglas E. Levy, Ph.D., MGH Institute for Health Policy, 50 Staniford Street, Suite 901, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Telephone: 617-643-3595. Fax: 617-724-4738. Email: douglas_levy2{at}hms.harvard.edu


   Abstract

Introduction: Among cigarette smokers, lower levels of consumption, defined as smoking fewer cigarettes per day (CPD) or not smoking daily, are becoming more common. The relationship between cigarette consumption and smoking frequency (daily or nondaily) is not well characterized, and the natural history of light smoking (defined here as smoking ≤10 CPD) is poorly understood.

Methods: We assessed changes in CPD and smoking frequency over time among light smokers (≤10 CPD) and very light smokers (≤5 CPD), using a population-based longitudinal survey of 3,083 adult smokers in Massachusetts who were interviewed three times over a 4-year follow-up period (in 2000–2001, 2002–2003, and 2005–2006). We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with light smokers’ progression to heavier smoking or smoking reduction/quitting.

Results: Seventy percent of very light smokers were nondaily smokers. Very light nondaily smokers differed from very light daily smokers by younger age, higher socioeconomic status, a social smoking pattern, later smoking initiation, less evidence of nicotine addiction, and more recent and planned cessation efforts. Very light nondaily smokers and smokers consuming 6–10 CPD were more likely to remain in the same smoking category and were less likely to increase consumption than were very light daily smokers. Factors independently associated with increasing consumption among very light smokers were smoking daily, nicotine dependence, White ethnicity, social smoking, and having more friends who smoked; among smokers consuming 6–10 CPD, male gender and lack of quitting self-efficacy were associated with increasing consumption.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that most light smoking is not a gateway to heavier smoking.

Received: January 8, 2008; Accepted: April 13, 2008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.