Skip Navigation


Nicotine & Tobacco Research Advance Access originally published online on January 27, 2009
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2009 11(1):58-63; doi:10.1093/ntr/ntn011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Article Summary
Right arrow Article Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/1/58    most recent
ntn011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mariscalco, G.
Right arrow Articles by Engström, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mariscalco, G.
Right arrow Articles by Engström, K. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.Permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Are current smokers paradoxically protected against atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery?

Giovanni Mariscalco and Karl Gunnar Engström

Giovanni Mariscalco, M.D., Department of Surgical Sciences, Cardiac Surgery Unit, Varese University Hospital, Varese, Italy, and Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Cardiothoracic Department, Heart Center, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
Karl Gunnar Engström, M.D., Ph.D., FRCS., Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Cardiothoracic Department, Heart Center, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden

Corresponding Author: Giovanni Mariscalco, Department of Surgical Sciences, Cardiac Surgery Unit, Varese University Hospital, I-21100 Varese, Italy. Telephone: +39-347-9689055. Fax: +39-0332-264394. E-mail: giovannimariscalco{at}yahoo.it


  Abstract

Background: The hyperadrenergic condition following surgical stress and inotropic drugs have been identified as leading causes for postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF). Smokers are characterized by higher catecholamine levels and tolerance. We tested the hypothesis that smoking patients are less prone to develop postoperative AF.

Methods: A total of 3,245 coronary artery bypass and valvular procedures were reviewed. Predictors of AF and interaction between variables were explored by multivariable logistic regression. AF-predictive scores were created and validated for goodness of fit, and receiver operating characteristic curves were created.

Results: Postoperative AF occurred in 26% of patients. Smokers accounted for 15% of the study population and demonstrated a reduced incidence of postoperative AF compared with nonsmoking individuals (20% vs. 27%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant interaction between smoking status and inotropic support requirement. The AF-protective effect of smoking was confounded by inotropic drugs. However, when we excluded from analysis the patients with inotropic support, smoking conferred a 46% risk reduction of AF (odds ratio [OR] = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.34–0.87, p = .011). In addition, age, valvular surgery, and hypertension were independently associated with AF. Postoperative AF increased the length of hospitalization, without affecting hospital mortality. AF was associated with an increased 1-year mortality (p = .002).

Discussion: Current smokers are less prone to develop AF after cardiac surgery. Our data support the hypothesis that hyperadrenergic state and catecholamines are key mechanisms in the pathophysiology of postoperative AF.

Received: January 15, 2008; Accepted: May 27, 2008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.